Artikel: EU Sanctions Compliance in the Global Context: What Are Best Efforts Obligations?

European Union ("EU") sanctions compliance has gone global. Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the EU has continuously expanded the substantive and geographic reach of its restrictive measures in innovative and unprecedented ways. Among these latest innovations is a requirement, now enshrined in several EU sanctions regulations concerning Russia and Belarus, for legal and natural persons subject to EU law ("EU operators") to undertake their best efforts to ensure that any entity that they own or control outside the EU do not undermine EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus. This obligation is commonly referred to as the "best efforts" clause or requirement. 

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Twee keer een beroep op het vertrouwensbeginsel bij het College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (CBb)

In twee recente uitspraken (ECLI:NL:CBB:2025:272 en ECLI:NL:CBB:2025:265) heeft het College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (CBb) zich uitgesproken over het beroep op het vertrouwensbeginsel door ondernemingen. Deze zaken benadrukken de strikte voorwaarden waaronder dit beginsel kan worden ingeroepen, vooral wanneer het Unierecht van toepassing is of wanneer er geen duidelijke toezeggingen zijn gedaan door de overheid.​

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: A new era of regulating EU sanctions compliance: a fragmented framework

The EU has introduced explicit compliance obligations in its 14th Russia sanctions package, marking a shift from just prohibiting certain economic activities to also mandating how businesses must ensure compliance. Previously, operators had to adhere to sanctions but were not given clear regulatory requirements on implementation within the regulations. The evolving framework extends beyond sanctions regulations to broader EU legislation, including anti-money laundering (AML), instant payments, and crypto-asset transactions. This fragmented approach risks resulting in overlapping yet incomplete obligations, uncertainty, and administrative complexity. Financial institutions face multiple layers of compliance rules, while other sectors remain underregulated. The article examines these regulatory developments, their scope and their impact on businesses. To improve enforcement and prevent circumvention, a more unified EU compliance framework is necessary. A risk-based, harmonised approach would reduce inconsistencies, enhance clarity for businesses, and ensure sanctions are more effective in practice.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: The Role of an AFCOS in a New Anti-fraud Architecture

It goes without saying that the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) form the heart of the protection of the EU’s financial interests. However, the national authorities of the EU Member States are in the frontline when it comes to fighting fraud, bearing in mind that achievements in the field of the protection of the EU's financial interests also depend on the readiness and capacity of OLAF’s and EPPO’s partners in the Member States, (potential) candidate countries, and other non-EU countries, all of which cooperate to this end.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Protecting EU Taxpayer Money together with Global Partners

The European Anti-Fraud Office was created 25 years ago, in 1999, to fight fraud, corruption, and any other illegal activities affecting the EU budget. While there are several anti-fraud actors at EU level, OLAF is unique with regard to its international activities. In particular, OLAF is mandated to conduct investigative activities directly on territory outside the EU. Against this background, the article traces the evolution of the EU legal framework for OLAF’s international investigations and the parallel development of OLAF’s international relations in practice. The analysis of OLAF’s engagement with international partners focuses on several key activities of the Office to protect EU funds abroad, especially negotiating anti-fraud provisions in international instruments, concluding administrative cooperation arrangements with non-EU countries and international organisations, and building networks of partners around the globe. Looking back at the past quarter of a century, the article demonstrates that many features which are hallmarks of OLAF’s international relations today can be traced back to the early years of the Office. The article also shows how these practices have grown and matured over time.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

The Protection of Fundamental Rights and Procedural Guarantees in OLAF Investigations: a 25-Year Journey

The protection of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees in administrative investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) has constantly evolved since its creation in 1999. First, the catalogue of procedural rights and guarantees embedded in the successive regulations governing the conduct of OLAF’s investigations was significantly expanded. Second, the existing mechanisms to ensure their protection were reinforced by the creation of the new function of the Controller of procedural guarantees and a new complaints mechanism. As a result, the legal framework under which OLAF operates at present is significantly more protective of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees than it was 25 years ago. This article sheds light on these two key developments: the progressive codification of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees applicable to OLAF’s investigations and the reinforcement of their protection by the creation of the new Controller and the new complaints mechanism.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

25 Years of OLAF: the office’s Digital Transformation and Some Reflections on What Lies Ahead

In today’s fast-changing world, the issue of digitalisation – or “tech” – is rapidly moving up the agenda. This observation also very much applies to the anti-fraud domain. On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in 2024, this article provides a retrospective of the progressive digitalisation of work at the Office. Arriving at today’s “digital first” paradigm has been a long journey since OLAF’s humble digital beginnings in 1999. The authors also review the parallel evolution of OLAF’s legal framework for data collection and data processing, and they offer some reflections on further digital challenges ahead.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: 25 Years of OLAF: Looking Back and Ahead

The article examines the evolution of the European Anti-Fraud Office over the past 25 years from its establishment in 1999 to its current role as a pivotal player in the fight against fraud affecting the EU’s financial interests. It starts by tracing OLAF's origins to its predecessor, the Unit for the Coordination of Fraud Prevention, and the circumstances surrounding OLAF’s creation as a response to major corruption scandals. The article goes on to analyse the legal framework underpinning OLAF’s mandate, in particular Regulation No. 883/2013 and Directive 2017/1371 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law, which expanded OLAF's scope and facilitated its cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Furthermore, OLAF's evolving relationship with the EPPO is explored and significant case law that has shaped OLAF’s investigative powers and procedural safeguards highlighted. The article concludes by reflecting on OLAF’s achievements and the challenges it faces in combating fraud in an increasingly complex and multifaceted international financial landscape.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Europol: georganiseerde criminaliteit in Europa ondergaat fundamentele transformatie

Naar aanleiding van het op 12 maart 2025 gepubliceerde rapport van Europol – de EU Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment 2025 (EU SOCTA) – is duidelijk geworden dat georganiseerde criminaliteit in Europa een fundamentele transformatie ondergaat. De analyse is meer dan een dreigingsrapport: het is een waarschuwing over hoe technologie, geopolitiek en digitale infrastructuur samenkomen in een snel evoluerend crimineel ecosysteem.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

EHRM: OM mocht tapgegevens aan mededingingsautoriteit verstrekken

EHRM 1 april 2025, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0401JUD000279916

Op 1 april 2025 heeft de Grote Kamer van het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens uitspraak gedaan in een principiële zaak tegen de Nederlandse Staat. De zaak betrof de overdracht van telefoontapgegevens, verkregen in het kader van strafrechtelijk onderzoek, van het Openbaar Ministerie (OM) aan de toenmalige Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (NMA, nu: ACM). Deze gegevens waren door de NMA gebruikt als bewijs in administratieve procedures waarbij aanzienlijke boetes werden opgelegd aan zes Nederlandse bedrijven wegens kartelvorming en prijsafspraken. De bedrijven klaagden dat deze overdracht een schending vormde van hun rechten onder artikel 8 (recht op respect voor correspondentie) en artikel 13 (recht op een effectief rechtsmiddel) van het Europees Verdrag voor de Rechten van de Mens.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^