Geen schriftvereiste voor erkenning Europees Onderzoeksbevel

Hoge Raad 9 september 2025, ECLI:NL:HR:2025:1234

De Hoge Raad oordeelt dat de erkenning van een Europees Onderzoeksbevel (EOB) niet schriftelijk hoeft te worden vastgelegd. Een mondelinge mededeling van de officier van justitie volstaat, mits duidelijk is dat het EOB is beoordeeld en erkend. De rechtbank mocht daarom afgaan op de verklaring van de officier van justitie in raadkamer. Er is geen schending van wet- of EU-recht. Het cassatieberoep wordt verworpen.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

European Preservation and Production Orders: A Non-Exclusive Approach to E-Evidence within the EU

The main piece of the legislative package on electronic evidence – Regulation 2023/1543 (hereinafter: the e-evidence Regulation) establishes a new mutual recognition instrument for preserving and obtaining e-evidence from service providers located in another jurisdiction by means of European Preservation Orders (EPOC-PR) and European Production Orders (EPOC). It will be applicable in the EU Member States (except Denmark) as of 18 August 2026. As has often been stressed, this mutual recognition instrument, especially the revolutionary approach of allowing trans-border requests to be sent directly from the judicial authority of one Member State to the service provider of another Member State, takes the field of judicial cooperation beyond its traditional boundaries.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Leergang Het Nieuwe Wetboek van Strafvordering | Start 11 november 2025

Er komt een nieuw Wetboek van Strafvordering aan – en de impact op de strafrechtspraktijk is groot. Tijdens de praktijkgerichte leergang van BijzonderStrafrecht Academie maken deelnemers uitgebreid kennis met de wijzigingen in het nieuwe wetboek en de gevolgen daarvan voor hun dagelijkse werk als strafrechtprofessional.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Transnational Evidence

On 3 April 2014, Directive 2014/41/EU regarding the European investigation order in criminal matters was finally approved. This instrument seeks to overcome the present fragmentary regulation on the gathering and transfer of cross-border evidence and improve the efficiency of the international judicial cooperation among the Member States. This article analyses the scope, content, and requirements of the European investigation order in order to make an assessment of this Directive from the point of view of the protection of the fundamental rights envisaged in Article 48 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, and, in particular, the right of defence in transnational criminal proceedings.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Information Sharing between OLAF and National Judicial Authorities

When dealing with the question of the sharing of information by OLAF, such a reflection must necessarily address the status of OLAF, not only taken individually but also in the more general context of the array of (present and future) European institutions. From its position in the European legal order, as a supranational body responsible for "the fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity adversely affecting the Community’s financial interests,"OLAF is empowered to request the assistance of the competent national administrative authorities of the Member States operating in the same area, which are under an obligation to provide such assistance.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^