European Preservation and Production Orders: A Non-Exclusive Approach to E-Evidence within the EU

The main piece of the legislative package on electronic evidence – Regulation 2023/1543 (hereinafter: the e-evidence Regulation) establishes a new mutual recognition instrument for preserving and obtaining e-evidence from service providers located in another jurisdiction by means of European Preservation Orders (EPOC-PR) and European Production Orders (EPOC). It will be applicable in the EU Member States (except Denmark) as of 18 August 2026. As has often been stressed, this mutual recognition instrument, especially the revolutionary approach of allowing trans-border requests to be sent directly from the judicial authority of one Member State to the service provider of another Member State, takes the field of judicial cooperation beyond its traditional boundaries.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Leergang Het Nieuwe Wetboek van Strafvordering | Start 11 november 2025

Er komt een nieuw Wetboek van Strafvordering aan – en de impact op de strafrechtspraktijk is groot. Tijdens de praktijkgerichte leergang van BijzonderStrafrecht Academie maken deelnemers uitgebreid kennis met de wijzigingen in het nieuwe wetboek en de gevolgen daarvan voor hun dagelijkse werk als strafrechtprofessional.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Transnational Evidence

On 3 April 2014, Directive 2014/41/EU regarding the European investigation order in criminal matters was finally approved. This instrument seeks to overcome the present fragmentary regulation on the gathering and transfer of cross-border evidence and improve the efficiency of the international judicial cooperation among the Member States. This article analyses the scope, content, and requirements of the European investigation order in order to make an assessment of this Directive from the point of view of the protection of the fundamental rights envisaged in Article 48 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, and, in particular, the right of defence in transnational criminal proceedings.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Information Sharing between OLAF and National Judicial Authorities

When dealing with the question of the sharing of information by OLAF, such a reflection must necessarily address the status of OLAF, not only taken individually but also in the more general context of the array of (present and future) European institutions. From its position in the European legal order, as a supranational body responsible for "the fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity adversely affecting the Community’s financial interests,"OLAF is empowered to request the assistance of the competent national administrative authorities of the Member States operating in the same area, which are under an obligation to provide such assistance.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: Is the EU Ready for Automatic Mutual Recognition … in the Fight Against Crime?

Today, crime pays! This is a familiar statement. Assets of criminals remain sheltered and their value is significant at both European and international levels. The capacity for criminals to enjoy the fruits of their criminal endeavours has the following three immediate economic consequences. First, crime does pay. Second, criminal activities will continue to perpetuate, as criminals are able to invest in the future by having the means to corrupt others and inspire those keen to emulate their well-rewarded achievements. Third, as criminals seek to launder the fruits of their activities and reinvest in the regular economy, they create market distortions, for they are unfair competitors not having borne the initial costs of doing business.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^